Use beta cargo in opt-dist

[Kobzol]

Using the new stage2 cargo caused issues when a backwards-incompatible change was made to cargo. This means that we won't be testing the LTO/1-CGU optimized cargo, but I don't think that's a big issue, as we primarily want to test the compiler.

Should fix this failure.

[Kobzol]

@bors try

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 4b3283a with merge 695c7da...

[lqd]

let's not overload mark even more.

r=me if the tests pass on the try build

with this comment "// Extract rustc, libstd, cargo and src archives to create the optimized sysroot" fixed to remove "cargo"

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 695c7da (695c7dad5d8ca2d9f88bbe00ea17800edec2bf29)

[Kobzol]

Sigh, forgot to enable tests…

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 9a07348 with merge f1a7780...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: f1a7780 (f1a7780e20debb648355508e862be6e05480f895)

[Kobzol]

@bors r=lqd

[bors]

📌 Commit e5010ea has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[weihanglo]

Since it blocks cargo submodule update, should we make it p=1?

[lqd]

@bors p=1

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e5010ea with merge 5e16a02...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[Kobzol]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit d6f831b with merge 0c6e3ac...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 0c6e3ac (0c6e3ac271f0cd4d984382d4906b9c3bc8526de9)

[Kobzol]

Ok, now it is hopefully fixed.

@bors r=lqd

[bors]

📌 Commit 823d72a has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 823d72a with merge 567ea04...

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[ehuss]

@bors p=2

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 823d72a with merge 3c92dcc...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lqd
Pushing 3c92dcc to master...

[weihanglo]

Thank you people!

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (3c92dcc): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.9%	[1.0%, 2.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.3%, -2.8%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-3.3%, 2.7%]	4

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 629.54s -> 631.74s (0.35%)
Artifact size: 304.12 MiB -> 304.08 MiB (-0.01%)