Rollup of 5 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• fix typos in comments #117081 (fix typos in comments)
• OptWithInfcx naming nits, trait bound simplifications #117091 (OptWithInfcx naming nits, trait bound simplifications)
• Add regression test for #117058 #117092 (Add regression test for regression: parsing change in allow()? #117058)
• Update books #117093 (Update books)
• remove change-id assertion in bootstrap test #117105 (remove change-id assertion in bootstrap test)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit 9510e97 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 9510e97 with merge 98b4a64...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 98b4a64 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#117081	fix typos in comments	af5c66eaf7a9cf64dcbb76ed9ec5828dff2a6619 (link)
#117091	OptWithInfcx naming nits, trait bound simplifications	c938106b2edbdca86b1891cb9543868691e2a9b9 (link)
#117092	Add regression test for #117058	4879ad18c6a3cddd74511aeefb85eae15c2179d7 (link)
#117093	Update books	40313a1da84a63f4a9a6a009469f7b72ec561064 (link)
#117105	remove change-id assertion in bootstrap test	2fba6768cb2708975df3a094cac8b238ffea61ef (link)

previous master: 07a4b7e2a9

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (98b4a64): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.3%	[3.3%, 3.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.9%	[-2.2%, -1.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.3%	[3.3%, 3.3%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data
Artifact size: 304.38 MiB -> 304.34 MiB (-0.01%)